CO129-307 - Governor Sir Blake - 1901 [10-12] — Page 259

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

13 of 1901

EN CLOSURE

2

C.O.

141668

ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, 25 NOV 01

256

3rd October, 21st October 1901.

Report on Ordinance No. 33 of 1901,

I have examined the accompanying Ordinance, entitled

Public

No. 33

of 1901.

and I am of opinion that the Ordinance is one which is not contrary to the Governor's Instructions.

Objects and Reasons.

By reason of the wording of sections 54 and 56 of this Ordinance it has been considered necessary, in strict law, to call upon owners of buildings to provide on their own land backyards, open spaces in the rear, or lanes, as the case might be, even though public streets of a permanent character were in the rear of such buildings. It has accordingly been thought advisable to make the amendments introduced by clauses 2 and 3 of this Bill, with a view to enabling, in certain of such cases, an exemption to be made from the strict requirements of sections 54 and 56 of Ordinance No. 18 of 1901.

The amendments in question are very similar in their language to sub-section (c) of section 55 of Ordinance No. 13 of 1901.

E. Pollock

being allowed formal

Edit History

2026-06-01 01:48:57 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
13 of 1901 EN CLOSURE 2 C.O. 141668 ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, 25 NOV 01 256 3rd October, 21st October 1901. Report on Ordinance No. 33 of 1901, I have examined the accompanying Ordinance, entitled Public No. 33 of 1901. and I am of opinion that the Ordinance is one which is not contrary to the Governor's Instructions. Objects and Reasons. By reason of the wording of sections 54 and 56 of this Ordinance it has been considered necessary, in strict law, to call upon owners of buildings to provide on their own land backyards, open spaces in the rear, or lanes, as the case might be, even though public streets of a permanent character were in the rear of such buildings. It has accordingly been thought advisable to make the amendments introduced by clauses 2 and 3 of this Bill, with a view to enabling, in certain of such cases, an exemption to be made from the strict requirements of sections 54 and 56 of Ordinance No. 18 of 1901. The amendments in question are very similar in their language to sub-section (c) of section 55 of Ordinance No. 13 of 1901. E. Pollock being allowed formal
Baseline (Original)
> 13 of 1901 EN CLOSURE 2 C.0. 141668 به هم ATTORNEY GENERAES OFFICERĒE? 25 NOV 01 256 3borg Morz, 21th Ocbrown 1901. Report on Ordinance. 33 of 1907, I have examined the accompanying Ordinance, entitled Jedan Public Chan TA amand Beall No. /3 of 15017 An the 1901. and I am of opinion that the Ordinance is one which is not contrary to the Governor's Instructions. Objects and Reasons. By reason of the wording of sections 54 and 56 of this Ordinance it has been considered necessary, in strict law, to call upon owners of buildings to provide on their own fand backyards, open spaces in the rear, or lanes, as the the case might be, even though public streets of a permanent Character were in the rear of such buildings. It has accord- ingly been thought advisable to make the amendments introduced by elätises 2 amí 3 of this Bill, with a view to enabling, in certain of such cases, an exemption to be made from the strict requirements of sections 54 and 56 of Ordinance 18 of 1901. $ The amendments is question are very similar in their language to sub-section (c.) of section 55 of Ordinance 13 of: 1901. 36. E. Pollock beling allowing formal
2026-06-01 01:48:57 · Baseline
View content

>

13 of 1901

EN CLOSURE

2

C.0.

141668

به هم

ATTORNEY GENERAES OFFICERĒE? 25 NOV 01

256

3borg Morz, 21th Ocbrown 1901.

Report on Ordinance. 33 of 1907,

I have examined the accompanying Ordinance, entitled

Jedan

Public

Chan TA

amand

Beall

No.

/3

of 15017

An

the

1901.

and I am of opinion that the Ordinance is one which is not contrary to

the Governor's Instructions.

Objects and Reasons.

By reason of the wording of sections 54 and 56 of this Ordinance it has been considered necessary, in strict law, to call upon owners of buildings to provide on their own fand backyards, open spaces in the rear, or lanes, as the the case might be, even though public streets of a permanent Character were in the rear of such buildings. It has accord- ingly been thought advisable to make the amendments introduced by elätises 2 amí 3 of this Bill, with a view to enabling, in certain of such cases, an exemption to be made from the strict requirements of sections 54 and 56 of Ordinance 18 of 1901.

$

The amendments is question are very similar in their language to sub-section (c.) of section 55 of Ordinance 13 of: 1901.

36. E. Pollock

beling allowing formal

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.